The woman agreed to share her story with the Sun but asked not to be named, due to health privacy concerns. Last summer, Cole misdiagnosed another Idaho woman with a precursor to a rare gynecologic cancer. The woman’s primary care doctor and surgeon did not respond to inquiries from the Sun.ĭiagnosis of precancerous changes ‘didn’t add up’ Both the surgeon and the patient are understandably upset at the misdiagnosis by (Cole).” “The findings at Stanford were also negative for cancer. “Pathologic evaluation of all the surgical specimens was negative for cancer,” the complaint said.īecause of the discrepancy between Cole’s diagnosis and the apparent lack of cancer, the hospital sent the tissue to Stanford University for review “to ensure a cancer had not been missed,” the complaint said. That tissue went to a laboratory for examination - where pathologists found no cancer. The surgeon removed her reproductive organs, along with lymph nodes and tissue from her abdomen, the complaint said. The patient’s health care provider referred her to a gynecologic cancer specialist, and she was scheduled for surgery. Serous carcinoma can be a very fast-moving cancer with a high mortality rate. The woman underwent a biopsy of her uterus, and the health care provider sent the biopsied tissue to Cole DiagnosticsĬole sent back a diagnosis of “ serous carcinoma,” the complaint said. The patient saw a Treasure Valley primary care doctor in December 2021, according to the complaint. The latest complaint said Cole had misdiagnosed a 64-year-old woman, who then had urgent surgery to remove the cancerous body parts - only to learn she didn’t actually have cancer. One Idaho woman had major surgery following misdiagnosis Cole directed the Sun to attorney Steven Biss, who did not respond to three emails and a voicemail from the Sun. The Sun reached out to Cole for comment, clarification or context regarding these allegations. The commission has received several complaints about Cole’s conduct and is investigating them, as the Sun reported last year. The complaint suggested the licensing board investigate whether Cole was either intentionally or subconsciously delivering the wrong diagnoses on cancer screenings, in service of his claims about vaccinations and cancer. “In his talks he attributes this increase to the COVID-19 vaccines and has convinced many people to refuse vaccination due to the concern that the COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer,” it said. (The Washington state health department redacted the identity of the physician who filed the complaint.) I’m like, ‘Gosh, I’ve never seen this many endometrial cancers before,’” he said.Ī complaint to the Washington Medical Commission raised concerns about whether Cole’s claims may have a relationship with misdiagnosing patients with cancer.Ĭole “has asserted that he has seen a 20-fold increase in cancers in his laboratory this year,” said the complaint, obtained by the Sun through a public records request. In the video, Cole singled out gynecologic cancers. That one video of Cole’s claims about cancer has been shared and viewed more than 600,000 times on social media and video-sharing platforms - not counting its circulation before it was removed from YouTube. Gigi Gronvall, immunology expert and senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, told Reuters in an article fact-checking the claims. “If - and it’s a big if - he is seeing genuinely more cancer patients in a way that is statistically verifiable now, it is likely due to people putting off cancer and other medical screening during the last couple years,” Dr. “I’ve seen a 20 times increase of endometrial cancers over what I see on an annual basis - a 20 times increase, not exaggerating at all,” Cole said in a video produced by anti-vaccination group Health Freedom Idaho in August 2021. Ryan Cole, according to reporting by the Sun.Ĭole diagnosed the patients in the past year - while claiming to see a spike in cancers at his laboratory and attributing that spike to immune damage from the COVID-19 vaccine.Ĭole has not publicly produced evidence to support that claim, while experts who refute his claim have shared their evidence and directly debunked his mischaracterizations of their research. Another woman thought she was developing it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |